Видео

I clicked on this video having no idea what a spinner is, but the thumbnail made me think you might be talking about what's called a half-spin: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-1/2

here is a thought this equation chained to a few others could prove my assertion: that everything within the whole space room is nothing more then sets or groups of matrices within matrices or as some would say dimensions within dimensions , two off the wall examples, dark energy dark matter, current quantum theory! the other question is , what does that equation look like in Physics? thinking is a chicken feeding a shark, the shark in your brain mind chain, the chicken is the food your brain/mind eats , the food you use determines the outputs you get or want! i f you think on end for days about a single subject your mind at all levels is in a way forced to consider all possibilities you know of? ex, E=MC^2 amazing equation from the solid state to the wave state, you are forced to consider everything this represents with everything you know and what is known? functions within functions in an algorithm that form fractiles scalar waves at the super position edge of space time, some call it perfect symmetry, some thing or some one set this up at some point in past history? this is not a random big bang multiverse , this is engineered by a super technology lightyears from E=MC^2 . the question is what is the relationship between these over layed matrices? think of it in terms of field energy boundaries, within a set of fields how many fields are there? what would the equation look like? The Great Unknown can be known it just take work and faith. .............Sci24

Check Élie Cartan’s work, 1913 or “Spinors and Space-Time” by Penrose. The “square roots” in sections of vector bundles, describe intrinsic angular momentum (spin) of particles like electrons.

Nice video, but what about grunge and disco.

I'm not sure how i got here but this is really great.

You are a master teacher and conveyor of ideas

2:35 it feels "geometric"

Amazing and highly illuminating. Keep doing this.

I wish I had this video around when I was taking quantum 50 years ago. I had to visualize all of this in my head, not knowing if I was right or wrong. Plus, imagine furiously writing down all these derivations from the blackboard while trying to understand the logic hoping my notes will make sense later on. Well done. ;-)

Rotating twice to get back to where you started makes sense if you rotate in the opposite direction like turning up the radio knob

Incredible video. So well made. Im an undergrad and found this video so interesting and amazing. Thank you

What video do I need to watch first to be able to understand this one?

2 mins in... And I'm already harrdd😍🤭😈

14:16 Omg there's no such thing as a particle at rest

make a harder problem next time.

done.

sure. piece of cake.

you're asking for a point that exists as all points?

what the fuck is a spinor?

well i'm pleased you covered existentialism.

what in the fucking horse fuck is this?

It occurs to me that the surface points of the axis-angle sphere could be identified with the opposite points, rather than of the _same_ sphere, of _one other_ sphere - a slightly different topological object, but one that clearly divides into two classes the rotations whose result is identical in flag space - preserving a clear distinction between the 2 types of continuous incremental path which achieve the rotation. A single 360 degree rotation puts you in the second sphere, and does _not_ close the loop in the dual-sphere space. It is more like the spinor's or lepton's point of view. The 2 covers become 2 different spheres. Which sphere are you in?

Thank you so much for making these videos, they are so good

Oh wait ...there's more than one definition?

*nods head* Mmhmm yes Indeed

in the you'd tube. straight up wortching it. and by "it". haha lets just say. my spinor

Wow. This video is so underrated. I only know basic high school physics, and it wasn't that hard for me to follow this video. It was so fun listening to your simple yet detailed explanations of everything

Finally someone who acknowledges the possibility to intuit 4D instead of hand waving it as unimaginable

why this ended up in my recommended i'll never know. i flunked Algebra twice in high school lol

This is hard. 😂

Thank you so much for the great content. So, in atoms there’s degenerative orbitals right, where the energy level is the same. And in one of these orbitals two electrons of different spin states exists. Electrons are existing as a standing wave, and now that there’s two electrons in the same energy level, how do they exist? Do they interfere with each other or not ? Thank you.

7:35 so this is how 2D organisms see the world. And how we see 4D situations.

52:39 what is that dark spots in colorful line?

❤ your voice!!! I just subbed because I'm fascinated by science and I can fall asleep listening to you!!Thank you for your energy, nothing is lost!

Will there be later videos on the fine and hyperfine structure of hydrogen?

Hey, I reach out as a University student passioned by learning. My dream is making animations / visuals like you do, but unfortunately, nobody in my CS department does this. I want to join research in Physics, and offer rendering visuals as what I can contribute in exchange for learning more about Physics / more time with Physics professors. Do you think you could give me an explanation on what I can learn in order to develop this as a skill? I would be infinitely grateful if you could provide me with some guidance over this matter. :D Resources or describing your own experience getting into it would be a world of help. Or even just a list of things I need to look at in order to be able to do this. Thanks for your time, if so.

An amazing presentstion and extremely insightful video, one of the best. Thank you for this!

.. my brain is now broken... thanks.

Really SUPERLATIVE lesson, Richard. This one is a keeper. Thank you!

51:59 why do the “strings” in the animation only appear flexible in relation to a relatively small space around the thing to which they are connected. I don’t have a deep enough understanding of physics to understand it but for a layman it seems to be a violation for the point of illustration?

Finally, someone with deep knowledge of physics who believes that Lorentz Invariance is fallible! That’s refreshing!

Is it possible to get this site to play with harmonics ? Thank you.

I find that thinking in images helps me work through. I was watching a different video that mentioned spinors and boom i remembered this one and had to share what i think will help. Think of the flagpole analogy as going round a mobius strip. If this doesn't add up, I'd like to know.

I understand like 7% of the content of your videos but you're funny and your voice is nice so keep it up

Thank you foer extending the visuals into Tesseract terrortory. (not a typo, as this maths scares most)

sorry , i missed a couple classes, can I borrow someone's notes?

If (at 6 mins) electrons/positrons live on separate ‘half’s’ of the bispinner, in separate ‘channels’ could it be appropriate to assume that in the special case scenario a Mid/Side transformation of the Dirac impulse can occur? As in doubling and or halving of the magnitude of the impulse? Sum and Difference? As above, so below, if indeed the Dirac is an analogue to the Kronecher Delta?

Idea for future video: If GR is second order (due to Lorentz inv. - like Maxwells) and we know it to be experimentally verified how do we reconcile the “first orderness” of Dirac Eq. ? Ie. How does an electron psi function get altered by gravity? Square Dirac?

Study holograms

"you mind if I put on some white noise? it helps me sleep"